*

Luderick (2018)

Girella tricuspidata

  • Matt Broadhurst (Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales)
  • Bradley Moore (Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania)
  • Kylie Hall (Victorian Fisheries Authority)
  • Luke Albury (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland)
Toggle content

Summary

Luderick is a sustainable species which inhabits shallow coastal and estuarine waters. It occurs from southern QLD to northern TAS and across to SA.

Toggle content

Stock Status Overview

Stock status determination
Jurisdiction Stock Fisheries Stock status Indicators
New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria Eastern Australia EGF, OHF, ECIFFF, SF, GLF Sustainable Catch, effort, fishing mortality, size composition
ECIFFF
East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (QLD)
EGF
Estuary General Fishery (NSW)
GLF
Gippsland Lakes Fishery (VIC)
OHF
Ocean Hauling Fishery (NSW)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)
Toggle content

Stock Structure

Luderick inhabits shallow coastal and estuarine waters from southern Queensland to northern Tasmania and across to South Australia [Ferguson et al. 2013, Gray and Miskiewicz 2000, Gray et al. 2012, Smith and Sinerchia 2004]. While the biological stock structure of Luderick remains unknown, tagging studies indicate some adults move considerable distances along the eastern Australian coastline, and across the jurisdictional boundary between New South Wales and southern Queensland [Gray et al. 2012]. Limited genetic data support the existence of a single Eastern Australia biological stock [Curley et al. 2013].

Here, assessment of stock status is presented at the biological stock level—Eastern Australia.

Toggle content

Stock Status

Eastern Australia

This cross-jurisdictional stock is fished in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania. Each jurisdiction assesses that part of the biological stock that occurs in its waters. The status presented here for the entire biological stock has been established using evidence from all four jurisdictions.

In Queensland, Luderick is predominantly taken by the inshore commercial gillnet (or ‘mesh net’) fishery [Halliday et al. 2001]. In 2017, the commercial harvest was 5.5 tonnes (t) and substantially less than an annual average of 14.5 t during 2005–16, although catches are known to have been greater in the past. The recent reduction in catch is reflected in the decline of effort from 267 days in 2016 to only 152 days in 2017. Recent estimates of the recreational harvest of Luderick in Queensland are unreliable, because only one household reported catching the species during a 2013–14 survey [Webley et al. 2015]. A minimum legal length, set at 300 mm total length (TL ), close to the size at first maturity [Pollock 1981, Gray et al. 2012, Curley et al. 2013] applies to Luderick, which protects a portion of the spawning stock. A recreational possession limit of 10 restricts fishing pressure [Campbell 2013]. While there are no current concerns for Luderick in Queensland, there is insufficient information available to confidently classify the biomass or the level of fishing pressure for this part of the stock.

In New South Wales, the main commercial fishery for Luderick occurs in estuaries (mostly using mesh nets but also haul seines) and, to a lesser extent, inshore ocean waters (haul seines) [Gray et al. 2002, 2005a, 2005b, Broadhurst et al. 2003, Gray and Kennelly 2003]. Commercial landings reached a peak of more than 700 t in 1988 but then declined with a reduction in effort to less than 400 t in 2004. Over the subsequent decade, annual landings varied considerably between 280 and 450 t [Hall 2015] but decreased to 250 and 198 t in 2016 and 2017, respectively. The latter reductions follow declining effort and a fairly consistent nominal catch rate by haul seiners, although the nominal catch rate for mesh netting (the most common harvest method) has slightly declined, but remains within the range observed over the past ten years. The trend in nominal catch rate may reflect a shift in targeting priorities to higher-value species by remaining fishers. In terms of recreational catches, West et al. [2015] estimated a decline by more than 50 per cent from ~383 t in 2000–01 to ~150 t in 2013–14, associated with similar declines in effort, but with high uncertainty owing to divergent sampling methods. The mean size of Luderick remained consistent to 2011 (no subsequent data are available). The above evidence indicates that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be depleted and that recruitment is unlikely to be impaired.

There are no current estimates of fishing mortality for Luderick. Previous estimates from the late 1990s (prior to the reduction in fishing effort in New South Wales) varied considerably between estuaries, but in more than 50 per cent of cases were historically equal to, or less than, natural mortality [Gray et al. 2010]. Fishing mortality is expected to have decreased over the past decade owing to the recent reductions in commercial fishing effort, and especially among juveniles following improved mesh net selectivity [Broadhurst et al. 2003, Gray et al. 2005a] and more recent changes in haul seine selectivity [Broadhurst et al. 2007]. A minimum legal length (MLL) of 270 mm TL, spatial closures and bag limits for recreational fishers (10 per day or 20 in possession) in New South Wales minimise fishing pressure on the spawning stock, and studies imply Luderick is among the most resilient of estuarine teleosts to being caught, handled and released. Specifically, Butcher et al. [2011] observed 99 per cent short-term survival among all sizes of Luderick when released by hook-and-line, while Broadhurst et al. [2009] recorded 83 per cent survival among mesh-netted-and-discarded juveniles. Collectively, the above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause this part of the stock to become recruitment impaired.

In Victorian waters, Luderick is commercially harvested from the Gippsland Lakes Fishery and is mainly caught using mesh nets, although a small proportion of catch is attributed to haul seines [Kemp et al. 2011, Victorian Bays and Inlets Fisheries Association 2013, Ramm 1983]. Since 2000, the greatest catches were observed in 2007 (41.5 t); however, since then catches declined to approximately 2 t in 2017. Catch rates have declined continually since the most recent peak in 2007–08 [Conron et al. 2016]. The annual and recent five year average catch rates to 2014–15 were approximately 60 and 20 per cent below the long-term average, respectively [Conron et al. 2016]. However, because Luderick is generally taken as a bycatch species when fishers are targeting Black Bream, the catch rate may not provide a reliable index of abundance for Luderick. The uncertainty regarding interpretation of catch-rate trends makes it difficult to know whether current fishing pressure is impacting the spawning stock biomass within the Gippsland Lakes Fishery. Fishing pressure is limited by a minimum legal length of 230 mm TL for both commercial and recreational fishers, and a daily bag limit of 10 fish for recreational fishers. Harvesting within the Gippsland Lakes is unlikely to impact the overall biological stock, but there is insufficient information available to confidently classify the biomass or the level of fishing pressure for this part of the stock.

In Tasmanian waters, Luderick is a by-product species of the multi-gear, multi-species Tasmanian Scalefish Fishery, and is caught predominately using mesh net and handline methods. Commercial catches have been minimal, with an annual average of 0.37 t landed between 2001 and 2010 and an annual average of 0.11 t landed in the last five years. Reductions in commercial effort for Luderick reflect a general fishery-wide decline in effort. Estimated recreational catch from handline and mesh net methods is also minimal [Lyle and Tracey 2012, Lyle et al. 2014]. Given the negligible level of commercial and recreational catch in Tasmania, the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be depleted and recruitment is unlikely to be impaired. Further, the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired.

The evidence presented above indicates that for three parts of the stock (Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania), the status is undefined. However, only small catches and low effort are reported from these jurisdictions, and these are unlikely to have a significant impact on the overall biological stock. For the central part of the stock in New South Wales, where the bulk of the commercial and recreational catches are taken, the above evidence indicates that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be recruitment overfished and the current level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Eastern Australia biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Toggle content

Biology

Luderick biology [Gray et al. 2012, 2010, Pollock 1981]

Biology
Species Longevity / Maximum Size Maturity (50 per cent)
Luderick 24 years, 560 mm TL 4–4.5 years, 280–300 mm FL 
Toggle content

Distributions

Distribution of reported commercial catch of Luderick
Toggle content

Tables

Fishing methods
Queensland New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Commercial
Hook and Line
Net
Mesh Net
Haul Seine
Haul Seine/Beach Seine
Unspecified
Gillnet
Indigenous
Spearfishing
Hook and Line
Mesh Net
Recreational
Spearfishing
Hook and Line
Mesh Net
Management methods
Method Queensland New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Charter
Fishing gear and method restrictions
In possession limits
Size limit
Spatial closures
Commercial
Effort limits
Fishing gear and method restrictions
Licence
Limited entry
Size limit
Spatial closures
Temporal closures
Indigenous
Bag limits
Customary fishing permits
Native Title
Section 37 (1d)(3)(9), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority
Recreational
Bag limits
Fishing gear and method restrictions
In possession limits
Licence
Size limit
Spatial closures
Active vessels
Queensland New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
22 in ECIFFF 246 in EGF, 19 in OHF 10 in GLF 8 in SF
ECIFFF
East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (QLD)
EGF
Estuary General Fishery (NSW)
GLF
Gippsland Lakes Fishery (VIC)
OHF
Ocean Hauling Fishery (NSW)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)
Catch
Queensland New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Commercial 5.52t in ECIFFF 171.54t in EGF, 7.66t in OHF 2.03t in GLF 247.61kg in SF
Indigenous Unknown Unknown Unknown (No catch under permit) Unknown
Recreational Unknown 150 t (in 2013–14) Unknown < 0.5 t (2010)
ECIFFF
East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (QLD)
EGF
Estuary General Fishery (NSW)
GLF
Gippsland Lakes Fishery (VIC)
OHF
Ocean Hauling Fishery (NSW)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)

Queensland – Indigenous (Management Methods) In Queensland, under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers are able to use prescribed traditional and non-commercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.

New South Wales – Indigenous (Management Methods) The Aboriginal Cultural Fishing Interim Access Arrangement allows an Indigenous fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances—for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves. The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to take catches outside the recreational limits under the Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW), Section 37 (1d)(3)(9), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority. In cases where the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) applies fishing activity can be undertaken by the person holding native title in line with S.211 of that Act, which provides for fishing activities for the purpose of satisfying their personal, domestic or non-commercial communal needs. In managing the resource where native title has been formally recognised, the native title holders are engaged with to ensure their native title rights are respected and inform management of the State's fisheries resources.

Victoria – Indigenous (Management Methods) In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing may not apply to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Victorian traditional owners may have rights under the Commonwealth's Native Title Act 1993 to hunt, fish, gather and conduct other cultural activities for their personal, domestic or non-commercial communal needs without the need to obtain a licence. Traditional Owners that have agreements under the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010 (Vic) may also be authorised to fish without the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence. Outside of these arrangements, Indigenous Victorians can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 (Vic) that authorise fishing for specific Indigenous cultural ceremonies or events (for example, different catch and size limits or equipment). There were no Indigenous permits granted in 2017 and hence no Indigenous catch recorded.

Tasmania – Recreational (Management Methods) In Tasmania, a recreational licence is required for fishers using dropline or longline gear, along with nets, such as mesh net or beach seine.

Tasmania – Indigenous (Management Methods) In Tasmania, Indigenous persons engaged in aboriginal fishing activities in marine waters are exempt from holding recreational fishing licences, but must comply with all other fisheries rules as if they were licensed. If using pots, rings, set lines or mesh nets, Indigenous fishers must obtain a unique identifying code (UIC). The policy document Recognition of Aboriginal Fishing Activities for issuing a UIC to a person for Aboriginal Fishing activity explains the steps to take in making an application for a UIC.

Toggle content

Catch Chart

Commercial catch of Luderick - note confidential catch not shown
Toggle content

References

  1. Broadhurst, MK, Gray, CA, Young, DJ and Johnson, DD 2003, Relative efficiency and size selectivity of bottom-set gillnets for dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus, and other species in New South Wales, Australia, Archive of Fishery and Marine Research, 50: 289–302.
  2. Broadhurst, MK, Millar, RB and Brand, CP 2009, Mitigating discard mortality from dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus gillnets, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 85: 157–166.
  3. Broadhurst, MK, Wooden, MEL, Millar, RB 2007, Isolating selection mechanisms in beach seines, Fisheries Research, 88: 56–69.
  4. Butcher, PA, Broadhurst, MK, Hall, KC and Cooke, SJ 2011, Post-release survival and physiology of angled luderick (Girella tricuspidata) after confinement in keeper nets in an Australian estuary, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 572–579.
  5. Campbell, M 2013, Reducing the impact of discarded recreational fishing tackle on coastal seabirds, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation project 2011/057, Queensland Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane.
  6. Conron, S, Giri K, Hamer, P and Hall, K 2016, Gippsland Lakes Fishery Assessment 2016, Fisheries Victoria Science Report Series No. 14.
  7. Curley, BG, Jordan, AR, Figueira, WF and Valenzuela, VC 2013, A review of the biology and ecology of key fishes targeted by coastal fisheries in south-east Australia: identifying critical knowledge gaps required to improve spatial management, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 23: 435–458.
  8. Ferguson, AM, Harvey, ES, Taylor MD and Knott NA 2013, A herbivore knows its patch: luderick, Girella tricuspidata, exhibit strong site fidelity on shallow subtidal reefs in a temperate marine park, PLoS One, 8: e65838.
  9. Gray, C, Haddy, J, Fearman, J, Barnes, L, Macbeth, W and Kendall, B 2012, Reproduction, growth and connectivity among populations of Girella tricuspidata (Pisces: Girellidae), Aquatic Biology, 16: 53–68.
  10. Gray, CA 2002, Management implications of discarding in an estuarine multi-species gill net fishery, Fisheries Research, 56: 177–192.
  11. Gray, CA and Kennelly, SJ 2003, Catch characteristics of the commercial beach-seine fisheries in two Australian barrier estuaries, Fisheries Research, 63: 405–422.
  12. Gray, CA and Miskiewicz, AG 2000, Larval fish assemblages in south-east Australian coastal waters: seasonal and spatial structure, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 50: 549–570.
  13. Gray, CA, Broadhurst, MK, Johnson, DD and Young, DJ 2005, Influences of hanging ratio, fishing height, twine diameter and material of bottom‐set gillnets on catches of dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus and non‐target species in New South Wales, Australia, Fisheries Science, 71: 1217–1228.
  14. Gray, CA, Ives, MC, Macbeth, WG and Kendall, BW 2010, Variation in growth, mortality, length and age compositions of harvested populations of the herbivorous fish Girella tricuspidata, Journal of Fish Biology, 76: 880–899.
  15. Gray, CA, Johnson, DD, Broadhurst, MK and Young, D 2005, Seasonal, spatial and gear-related influences on relationships between retained and discarded catches in a multi-species gillnet fishery, Fisheries Research, 75: 56–72.
  16. Hall, KC 2015, Luderick (Girella tricuspidata), in J Stewart, A Hegarty, C Young, AM Fowler and J Craig (eds), Status of fisheries resources in NSW 2013–14, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Mosman, pp 199–202.
  17. Halliday, IA, Ley, JA, Tobin, A, Garrett, R, Gribble, NA and Mayer, DG 2001, The effects of net fishing: addressing biodiversity and bycatch issues in Queensland inshore waters, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation project 97/206, Department of Primary Industries, Queensland.
  18. Kemp, J, Bruce, T, Conron, S, Bridge, N, MacDonald, M and Brown, L 2013, Gippsland Lakes (non-bream) Fishery Assessment 2011, Fisheries Victoria Assessment Report Series No 67, ISSN 1329-7287.
  19. Lyle, JM and Tracey, SR 2012, Recreational gillnetting in Tasmania – an evaluation of fishing practices and catch and effort, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart
  20. Lyle, JM, Stark, KE and Tracey, SR 2014, 2012-2013 survey of recreational fishing in Tasmania. Institute for marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
  21. Pollock, BR 1981, Age determination and growth of luderick, Girella tricuspidata (Quoy and Gaimard), taken from Moreton Bay, Australia, Journal of Fish Biology, 19: 475–485.
  22. Ramm, D 1983, An ecological survey of postlarval and juvenile fish in the Gippsland Lakes (Victoria), Gippsland Regional Environmental Study Ministry for Conservation, Victoria.
  23. Smith, KA and Sinerchia, M 2004, Timing of recruitment events, residence periods and post-settlement growth of juvenile fish in a seagrass nursery area, south-eastern Australia, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 71: 73–84.
  24. Victorian Bays and Inlets Fisheries Association 2013, Environmental Management System, Victorian Bays and Inlets Fisheries Association, Victoria.
  25. Webley, J, McInnes, K, Teixeira, D, Lawson, A and Quinn, R 2015, Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane.
  26. West, LD, Stark, KE, Murphy, JJ, Lyle, JM and Doyle FA 2015, Survey of recreational fishing in New South Wales and the ACT, 2013/14, Fisheries Final Report Series.

Downloadable reports

Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.