Spangled Emperor (2018)
You are currently viewing a report filtered by jurisdiction. View the full report.
Spangled Emperor has a wide distribution around Australia. There are eight stocks across WA, the NT, QLD and NSW. In WA three stocks are sustainable and one is recovering. The NT stock is sustainable. In QLD one stock is sustainable and one is undefined. The NSW stock is negligible.
Stock Status Overview
|Queensland||East Coast Queensland||CRFFF||Sustainable||Catch, effort, standardised CPUE|
|Queensland||Gulf of Carpentaria||GOCDFFTF||Undefined||Catch, effort|
- Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (QLD)
- Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery (QLD)
Spangled Emperor have a widespread Indo-West Pacific distribution, ranging from the Red Sea, Persian Gulf, and East Africa east to southern Japan in the north, around northern Australia and extending east to Samoa [Carpenter and Allen 1989]. In Australia, Spangled Emperor are found from around Rottnest Island in the lower west coast, around northern Australia to south of Sydney on the east coast [Carpenter and Allen 1989, Carpenter and Niem 2001]. The population structure of Spangled Emperor in Western Australia has been studied by assessing spatial variation in allozymes [Johnson et al. 1993], otolith microchemistry [Moran et al. 1993], tagging and recapture [Moran et al. 1993], DNA micro-satellite markers [Berry et al. 2012], and acoustic telemetry [Pillans et al. 2014]. Individuals generally demonstrate a limited home range of less than three nautical miles [Moran et al. 1993]. Relatively high site fidelity has been shown for at least some individuals in Western Australia and elsewhere [Pillans et al. 2014, Chateau and Wantiez 2008]. Limited mixing of post-settlement individuals is also indicated from an analysis of otolith microchemistry of Spangled Emperor sampled from different sites [Moran et al. 1993].
Genetic studies have demonstrated homogeneous genetic characteristics across broad spatial scales (10–1 500 km) throughout its Western Australian distribution [Johnson et al. 1993]. Analysis of fine scale patterns using high resolution micro-satellite markers, however, has found that juveniles exhibit fine scale genetic autocorrelation, which declines with age [Berry et al. 2012]. This implies both larval cohesion and limited juvenile dispersal prior to maturity, primarily in the vicinity of the Ningaloo Marine Park [Berry et al. 2012]. Hydrodynamic modelling indicated that Spangled Emperor larvae were likely to be transported hundreds of kilometres, easily accounting for the observed gene flow, despite relatively restricted adult dispersal [Berry et al. 2012]. As such, Spangled Emperor are considered to comprise a single biological stock in at least Western Australia. However, there is limited mixing of adult Spangled Emperor. Further, management arrangements are mediated in a way that harmonises with the spatial patterns of exploitation. This indicates that in Western Australia, Spangled Emperor comprise separate management units.
There is a high likelihood that these population characteristics (extensive gene flow, limited adult movement) are shared across each of the jurisdictions. Low genetic subdivision between northwest Western Australia and the Great Barrier Reef suggests gene flow is likely to be high between these regions [Berry et al. 2012]. There is possibly one genetic stock in Australia, however, improved stock delineation is required in jurisdictions outside of Western Australia.
Here, assessment of stock status is presented at the management unit level—West Coast, Gascoyne, Pilbara, Kimberley (Western Australia); Gulf of Carpentaria, East Coast (Queensland); and New South Wales; and at the jurisdictional level—Northern Territory.
East Coast Queensland
There has been no formal stock assessment of the species across this management unit. Estimated recreational harvest of Spangled Emperor on the east coast of Queensland has declined over successive state-wide surveys from 29 000 to 20 000 to 14 000 fish in 2000–01, 2010–11 and 2013–14 respectively [Webley et al. 2015] which represents a decrease from 66 t to 41 t to 29 t. An increase in minimum legal size in 2003 (from 400 to 450 mm TL) and decrease in the possession limit (from 10 to 5) [Fisheries Regulation 1995] would have contributed to this decline. Recreational catches were around one third of the total landings for the species by weight based on 2013–14 recreational catch numbers [Webley et al. 2015], using fish lengths from fishery dependent monitoring [DAF unpublished data] and a length/weight conversion [Currey et al. 2010]. There is insufficient information available to confidently classify the status of this stock.
A decreased commercial catch coincided with expansion of no-take marine reserves within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the introduction of a quota management system for coral reef finfish species around 2003–04. Over the past nine years, the numbers of commercial fishing days where Spangled Emperor were reported have been stable (average 11 600 tender days), although with a higher level of 15 000 tender days in 2009–10. Fishing effort reported was much lower in the preceding 10 years (average 3 700 tender days). The annual reported commercial line harvest has been relatively stable with an average of 56 t for the last nine years and 51 t in 2016–17. A decline in landings over the past four years is likely due to reduced overall days where Spangled Emperor were reported rather than a change in stock abundance.
Spangled Emperor was added to the logbook template for the Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery in July 2007. Estimates prior to 2007 are likely underestimates as part of the catch and effort would have been reported in the group 'emperor' in the logbooks. Standardised commercial catch rates have remained stable since 2006–07 at around 10 kg/dory day. It is likely that a portion of the biomass would be afforded some protection from fishing through the no-take marine reserves existing within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park system, although this has not been quantified. The above evidence indicated that the current level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the East Coast of Queensland management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.
Gulf of Carpentaria
There has been no stock assessment of the species across this management unit. Spangled Emperor are a byproduct species group in the Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery and Gulf of Carpentaria Demersal Fin Fish Trawl Fishery with low annual catches (~1 t average since 2011–12). There are no reliable estimates of catch of Spangled Emperor for Indigenous or recreational catch in the GOC. There is insufficient information available to confidently classify the status of this stock.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Gulf of Carpentaria (Queensland) management unit is classified as an undefined stock.
Spangled Emperor biology [Currey et al. 2013, DAF unpublished data, Marriott et al. 2010, 2011]
|Species||Longevity / Maximum Size||Maturity (50 per cent)|
|Spangled Emperor||31 years: 707 mm FL (WA) 24 year:, 810 mm FL and 8.9kg (east coast Queensland/GBR)||3.6 years: 350 mm FL|
Distribution of reported commercial catch of Spangled Emperor
|Hook and Line|
|Hook and Line|
|Hook and Line|
|Hook and Line|
|Total allowable catch|
|Commercial||50.52t in CRFFF|
|Recreational||29 t (14 000 fish, 2013–14)|
- Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (QLD)
Western Australia – Recreational (Catch) Boat-based recreational catch is from 1 September 2015–31 August 2016. These data are derived from those reported in Ryan et al. (2017).
Western Australia – Recreational (management methods) A Recreational Fishing from Boat License is required for the use of a powered boat to fish or to transport catch or fishing gear to or from a land-based fishing location.
Western Australia – Indigenous Subject to the defence that applies under Section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by Indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.
Western Australia – Commercial (catch) Catch is unavailable as there were fewer than three vessels in the Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery, Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery and West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline (Interim) Managed Fishery.
Western Australia – Active Vessels Data is confidential as there were fewer than three vessels in the Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery, Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery and West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline (Interim) Managed Fishery.
Western Australia – Commercial (management methods) Spangled Emperor forms part of the combined Total Allowable Commercial Catch for other mixed demersal species in the GDSMF.
Queensland The reporting period for the commercial component of the Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland) is financial year (2016–17).
Queensland – Commercial (fishing methods) Spangled Emperor is trawled in only one of the Queensland fisheries in which it is caught commercially - the Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery
Queensland – Indigenous (management methods) Under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers in Queensland are entitled to use prescribed traditional and non-commercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.
Northern Territory — Charter (management methods) In the Northern Territory, charter operators are regulated through the same management methods as the recreational sector, but are subject to additional limits on license and passenger numbers.
Northern Territory – Indigenous (management methods) The Fisheries Act 1988 (NT), specifies that “…without derogating from any other law in force in the Territory, nothing in a provision of this Act or an instrument of a judicial or administrative character made under it limits the right of Aboriginals who have traditionally used the resources of an area of land or water in a traditional manner from continuing to use those resources in that area in that manner”.
Commercial catch of Spangled Emperor - note confidential catch not shown
- Moran, M, Edmonds, J, Jenke, J, Cassells and G, Burton, C, 1993, Fisheries biology of emperors (Lethrinidae) in north-west Australian coastal waters. Final Report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) on Project No. 89/20. Fisheries Department, Perth, Western Australia. 58p.
- (Family Lethrinidae). FAO Fisheries synopsis No. 125, Vol. 9. Rome: FAO, 126 pp.
- Berry, O, England, P, Marriott, RJ, Burridge, CP and Newman SJ 2012, Understanding age-specific dispersal in fishes through hydrodynamic modelling, genetic simulations and microsatellite DNA analysis. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2145–2159, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05520.x.
- Carpenter, KE and Allen, GR 1989, FAO Species Catalogue. Emperor Fishes and Large-Eyed Breams of the World
- Carpenter, KE and Niem VH (eds.) 2001, FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 5. Bony fishes part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome, FAO, pp. 2791–3380.
- Chateau, O and Wantiez, L 2008, Human impacts on residency behaviour of spangled emperor, Lethrinus nebulosus, in a marine protected area, as determined by acoustic telemetry. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 88, 825–829.
- Currey, LM, Williams, AJ, Mapstone, BD, Davies CR, Carlos G, Welch DJ, Simpfendorfer, CA, Ballagh, AC, Penny, AL, Grandcourt, EM, Mapleston, A, Wiebkin AS and Bean K 2013, Comparative biology of tropical Lethrinus species (Lethrinidae): challenges for multi-species management. Journal of Fish Biology, 82: 764–788.
- FISHERIES REGULATION 1995 (1998)
- Gaughan, DJ and Santoro K, (eds.) 2018, Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2016/17: The State of the Fisheries. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 237p.
- Johnson, MS, Hebbert, DR, Moran, MJ, 1993, Genetic analysis of populations of north-western Australian fish species. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 44: 673–685.
- Marriott, RJ, Adams, DJ, Jarvis NDC, Moran, MJ, Newman SJ, Craine M, 2011, Age-based demographic assessment of fished stocks of spangled emperor, Lethrinus nebulosus in the Gascoyne Bioregion of Western Australia. Fisheries Management and Ecology 18 (2): 89-103.
- Marriott, RJ, Jarvis, NDC, Adams, DJ, Gallash, AE, Norriss, J and Newman SJ, 2010, Maturation and sexual ontogeny in the spangled emperor Lethrinus nebulosus. Journal of Fish Biology, 76 (6): 1396–1414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02571.x
- Newman, SJ, Brown, JI, Fairclough, DV, Wise, BS, Bellchambers, LM, Molony, BW, Lenanton, RCJ, Jackson, G, Smith, KA, Gaughan, DJ, Fletcher, WJ, McAuley and RB, Wakefield, CB 2018, A risk assessment and prioritisation approach to the selection of indicator species for the assessment of multi-species, multi-gear, multi-sector fishery resources. Marine Policy, 88: 11–22.
- Newman, SJ, Wakefield, C, Skepper, C, Boddington, D, Jones, R and Smith E, 2018, North Coast Demersal Resource Status Report 2017. pp. 127–133. In: Gaughan, D.J. and Santoro, K. (eds.). Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2016/17: The State of the Fisheries. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 237p.
- Pillans, RD, Bearham, D, Boomer, A, Downie, R, Patterson, TA, Thomson, DP and Babcock, RC 2014. Multi-year observations reveal variability in residence of a tropical demersal fish, Lethrinus nebulosus: Implications for spatial management. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e105507.
- Ryan, KL, Hall, NG, Lai, EK, Smallwood, CB, Taylor, SM and Wise, BS 2017, Statewide survey of boat-based recreational fishing in Western Australia 2015/16. Fisheries research Report No. 287. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia, Perth.
- Webley, J, McInnes, K, Teixeira, D, Lawson, A and Quinn, R 2015, Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane.
- West, LD, Stark, KE, Murphy, JJ, Lyle, JM and Ochwada-Doyle FA, 2015, Survey of recreational fishing in New South Wales and the ACT, 2013–14, Fisheries final report series 149, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongong.
- Zhou, S and Griffiths SP, 2008, Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE): A new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to elasmobranch bycatch in an Australian trawl fishery. Fisheries Research, 91(1): 56–68.
Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.