School Shark Galeorhinus galeus

Nic Martona, Anthony Fowlerb, Corey Greenc, Jeremy Lyled, Rory McAuleye and Vic Peddemorsf


School Shark

Table 1: Stock status determination for School Shark

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth, New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia

Stock

Southern Australian
(EGF, EPTF, JASDGDLF, LACF, MSF, OF, OHF, OTF, OTLF, SESSF [SGSHS], SF)

Stock status

 

Overfished

Indicators

Estimate of biomass—relative pup production


EGF = Estuary General Fishery (New South Wales); EPTF = Estuary Prawn Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); JASDGDLF = Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Managed Fishery (Western Australia); LACF = Lakes and Coorong Fishery (South Australia); MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (South Australia); OF = Ocean Fishery (Victoria); OHF = Ocean Haul Fishery (New South Wales); OTF = Ocean Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); OTLF = Ocean Trap and Line Fishery (New South Wales); SESSF [SGSHS] = Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery – Shark Gillnet and Shark Hook Sectors (Commonwealth); SF = Scalefish Fishery (Tasmania)


Stock Structure

School Shark has a broad distribution throughout temperate waters of the eastern North Atlantic, western South Atlantic, and north-eastern and south-eastern Pacific, off South Africa, New Zealand and southern Australia. There is some uncertainty about the stock structure for School Shark1,2. A single biological stock is assumed for management purposes. A spatially structured fishery assessment model is applied to assess this biological stock because insufficient data exist to support more complex stock structure analysis1.


Stock Status

Southern Australian biological stock

Assessments since 1991 have consistently estimated that the School Shark biological stock is less than 20 per cent of the unfished biomass. As such, School Shark is subject to a rebuilding strategy. Recent analyses of catch data have not indicated any targeting of School Shark in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery – Shark Gillnet and Shark Hook Sectors. Therefore, all catch can be considered to be incidental. School Shark are predominantly taken as incidental catch in fisheries targeting Gummy Shark.

The most recent full stock assessment for school shark was published in 20093. In 2012, the 2009 assessment was rerun with additional catch data for the years 2009 to 20124. The updated model allows the rate of maximum sustainable yield (MSY:BMSY) to be estimated within the model, rather than being fixed at an assumed value (as was the case in the 2006 assessment). This resulted in a higher rate of maximum sustainable yield (4.4 per cent) than the 2006 assessment (3.5 per cent).

Concern remains about the ability of the stock assessment to reliably estimate the state of the stock. The assessment incorporates a number of fishery-dependent (catch-and-effort) and fishery-independent (survey) data series. However, given the low total allowable catches in recent years (potentially affecting quota availability, and the accurate reporting of catch and discards), the reported avoidance behaviour of fishers, and recent introduction of spatial closures predominantly off South Australia that prohibit the use of gillnets, the catch-per-unit-effort index may have become less reliable as an index of abundance in recent years5.

The biological stock is still considered to be below the Commonwealth Harvest Strategy Policy6 limit reference point (20 per cent of unfished biomass; B20) and as such is considered to be recruitment overfished7. Under a zero catch scenario, the stock was projected to rebuild to B20 within 23 years. However, even the setting of a total allowable catch that would allow rebuilding within 32 years (125 tonnes [t]) would severely constrain the Commonwealth Gummy Shark fishery. Catch scenarios up to 250 t were projected to allow recovery of the stock within three generation times (66 years), but catches of 275 t could not be sustained4. Total landed catch (that is, excluding discards) across all jurisdictions was 210 t in 2013.

Industry members have reported signs of increasing availability of School Shark, and that School Shark are becoming harder to avoid5. This is supported by preliminary survey work currently being conducted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies in pupping areas adjacent to Tasmania. The results are consistent with the 2009 stock assessment3, which suggested that adult biomass levels have stabilised or begun recovering. The results are also consistent with the 2012 stock assessment model results, which predict that rebuilding is likely to be occurring and that catches of 250 t or less would allow rebuilding, provided that gear selectivity and spatial and temporal distribution of catches remain similar to those in 2011. However, there is uncertainty around the rebuilding projections, resulting from uncertainty in assumptions relating to gear selectivity, and spatial and temporal distribution of catches in the 2012 assessment. It is therefore uncertain whether the total School Shark mortality (state and Commonwealth catches plus discards) is restricted to a level that will allow rebuilding. The above evidence indicates that it is uncertain whether the current level of fishing pressure is adequately controlled to allow the stock to recover from its recruitment overfished state7. Measurable improvements in biomass are yet to be detected.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as an overfished stock.


Table 2: School Shark biology8–11

Longevity and maximum size

50 years; ~1750 mm TL, 32.5 kg

Maturity (50%)

12–16 years; mean length at female maturity and pupping are 1240 and 1420 mm, respectively


TL = total length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of School Shark in Australian waters, 2010
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of School Shark in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)



Table 3: Main features and statistics for School Shark fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

Commonwealtha

New South Walesb

Victoria

Tasmania

South Australia

Western Australia

Fishing methods

Commercial

Demersal gillnet

Demersal longline

Dropline

Mechanised hand line

Auto-longline

Hand line

Ocean trawl

Recreationalc

Rod and line

Demersal longline

Gillnet

Indigenousd,e

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Gear restrictions

Spatial closures

Total allowable catch

Individual transferable quotas

Effort limits (individual transferable effort)

Possession restrictions

Processing restrictions

Trip limits

Size limits

Recreationalc

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Indigenousd,e,f,g

Bag limits

Size limits

Gear restrictions

Section 37(1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority

Active vessels

 

68 in SESSF (SGSHS)

13 in EGF

1 in EPTF

1 in OHF

15 in OTF

8 in OTLF

13 in OF

10 in SF

0 in LACF

54 in MSF

1 in JASDGDLF

Catch

Commercial

191 t in SESSF (SGSHS)

0.6 t in EGF

<0.01 t in EPTF

0.01 t in OHF

2.1 t in OTF

0.3 t in OTLF

0.6 t in OF

1 t in SF

0 t in LACF

12 t in MSF

0.5 t in JASDGDLF

Recreationalc

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

9.9 t (2007–08)12

Negligible catches from boats13

Shore-based catches are unknown

Indigenousd,e

Unknown

None

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown but likely to be negligible

Markets

Domestic

Export


EGF = Estuary General Fishery (New South Wales); EPTF = Estuary Prawn Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); JASDGDLF = Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Managed Fishery (Western Australia); LACF = Lakes and Coorong Fishery (South Australia); MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (South Australia); OF = Ocean Fishery (Victoria); OHF = Ocean Haul Fishery (New South Wales); OTF = Ocean Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); OTLF = Ocean Trap and Line Fishery (New South Wales); SESSF (SGSHS) = Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery – Shark Gillnet and Shark Hook Sectors (Commonwealth); SF = Scalefish Fishery (Tasmania)

a Data for the Commonwealth are for the SESSF 2013–14 fishing season (1 May 2013 – 30 April 2014).

b Data for New South Wales are for the 2013–14 financial year.

c The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.

d The Australian Government does not manage noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

e In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Victorian Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010) are exempt (subject to conditions) from the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, and can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 that authorise customary fishing (e.g. different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2012–13, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access School Shark.

f The Aboriginal Fishing Interim Compliance Policy allows an Indigenous fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances—for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves.

g The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to to take catches outside the recreational limits under the New South Wales Fisheries Management Act 1994, section 37(1)(c1) (Aboriginal cultural fishing authority).


Figure 2: Commercial catch of School Shark in Australian waters, 1970 to 2013 (calendar years)

Figure 2: Commercial catch of School Shark in Australian waters, 1970 to 2013 (calendar years)

Note: records of School Shark catch are unavailable for Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland for the period 1970–1999




Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • Interactions with marine mammals (Australian Sea Lions, Australian Fur Seals, New Zealand Fur Seals and Dolphins) in some gillnet fisheries continue to be an issue. Mitigation actions that have been implemented include spatial closures, increased monitoring, and implementation of the Australian Sea Lion Management Strategy14 and Dolphin Strategy15.

  • Dolphin interactions in the Commonwealth gillnet sector of the SESSF Gillnet, Hook and Trap Sector have recently been identified as an issue, based on the increased monitoring associated with managing interactions with Australian Sea Lions14. The Australian Fisheries Management Authority has closed areas where most interactions occur and increased observer coverage to 100 per cent in adjacent areas. These management measures were revised through the Dolphin Strategy for the 2014–15 fishing season15.

  • Offal management strategies, introduced in April 2011 include requirements for gillnet operators to remove any biological materials from nets before they are set. This has been effective in reducing seabird interactions in other fisheries14.

  • The use of auto-longlines in the SESSF Gillnet Hook and Trap Sector has raised concerns about the potential for interactions with seabirds, including albatrosses and shearwaters16. New measures have been implemented to assist industry to meet the Seabird Threat Abatement Plan 17 and Performance Criteria18.

  • Demersal gillnets are known to interact with a number of threatened and protected species, including marine mammals and seabirds, in areas of Western Australia where they are used to catch School Shark. However, such interactions occur at a very low frequency and have been assessed as posing low to negligible risks to these populations19.

  • Recent analysis of potential changes in ecosystem structure of finfish in the South and West Coast Bioregions of Western Australia found no evidence of systematic changes in species diversity, richness or trophic index, indicating that the Western Australian fisheries are not having a material impact on the food chain or trophic structure in these regions20.

  • The demersal gillnets used to catch School Shark in Western Australia are deployed infrequently over a small proportion of the target fisheries’ operational area. Under normal circumstances, the physical impact of the gear on the benthic habitat is minimal19.


Environmental effects on School Shark
  • Sea level rise and changes in sea temperature associated with climate change may negatively affect the School Shark biological stock because the habitats that School Shark use as nursery and feeding grounds are potentially prone to such effects21.


a Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
b South Australian Research and Development Institute
c Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria
d Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania
e Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
f Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales