Goldband Snapper Pristipomoides multidens

Julie Martina, Malcolm Keagb, Stephen Newmanc and Corey Wakefieldc


Goldband Snapper

Table 1: Stock status determination for Goldband Snapper

Jurisdiction

Northern
Territory,Queensland

Queensland

Western Australia

Stock

Northern Australian (DF, GOCDFFTF, TRF)

Queensland
(CRFFF, DWFFF)

Kimberli
(NDSMF)

Pilbara
(PFTIMF, PLF, PTMF)

Gascoyne
(GDSMF)

Stock status

 

 

 

 

Sustainable

Undefined

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Indicators

Catch, CPUE, SRA

Catch, quota usage, performance indicators

Biomass, age structure, catch, CPUE

Age structure, catch, CPUE

Age structure, catch


CPUE = catch per unit effort; CRFFF = Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); DF = Demersal Fishery (Northern Territory); DWFFF = Deep Water Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); GDSMF = Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); GOCDFFTF = Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery (Queensland); NDSMF = Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PFTIMF = Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PLF = Pilbara Line Fishery (Western Australia); PTMF = Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery (Western Australia); SRA = stochastic stock reduction analysis; TRF = Timor Reef Fishery (Northern Territory)


Stock Structure

Goldband Snapper is widely distributed throughout northern Australia and the tropical Indo–West Pacific. Analysis of otolith stable isotopes indicates separate biological stocks in each of the three management regions in Western Australia (Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne), and across northern Australia 1. Separate biological stocks exist between Australia and Indonesia2. The existence of multiple biological stocks across northern Australia and Western Australia suggests that several biological stocks may also be present on the east coast, although this remains to be determined. Because biological stock delineation is known for this species in the Northern Territory (including the Gulf of Carpentaria in Queensland), and Western Australia, stock status is reported at the level of individual biological stocks. On the east coast of Queensland, in the absence of information on biological stock boundaries, status is reported at the level of the Queensland east coast management unit.


Stock Status

Northern Australian biological stock

The northern Australian Goldband Snapper biological stock was assessed in 2011 and 2013 using a stochastic stock reduction analysis (SRA) model 3,4. Egg production was estimated to be around 65 per cent of that before the start of the fishery, which is well above conventional target levels. For this reason, the biological stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

About 90 per cent of the catch is from the Timor Sea and western Arafura Sea. Catch from the Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria is negligible. The Northern Territory total allowable commercial catch for Goldband Snapper is 1300 tonnes (t): 900 t in the Timor Reef Fishery and 400 t in the Demersal Fishery. In 2013, the total commercial catch of Goldband Snapper in the Northern Territory was 684 t. In Queensland, 1 t was caught. The SRA assessments indicated that the current harvest rate is below that required to achieve maximum sustainable yield. This low level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

East coast (Queensland) management unit

No formal stock assessments have been undertaken to quantify biomass levels of Goldband Snapper on the east coast of Australia.

Species-level reporting in commercial logbooks began in 2007 and has helped to quantify catch as a measure of fishing pressure. Catch trends of Goldband Snapper are monitored annually, but more information is required on attributes such as age structure to better understand fishing pressure. Goldband Snapper is managed as part of the ‘other species’ quota category, which comprises many other coral reef finfish species. There is a cap on the total catch for the group, but no individual cap on any one species within the group.

Insufficient information is available to confidently classify the status of this stock.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as an undefined stock.  

Kimberley biological stock

Goldband Snapper is exploited in the North Coast and Gascoyne bioregions of Western Australia5. It is one of the indicator species used to assess the status of the demersal resources in the North Coast Bioregion.

The major performance measures for Goldband Snapper in the Kimberley biological stock are estimates of spawning stock levels in the Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia). The target level of spawning biomass is 40 per cent of the unfished (1980) level. The limit level is 30 per cent of the initial spawning biomass. The spawning biomass of Goldband Snapper was estimated to be greater than 40 per cent of the unfished level in the Kimberley biological stock in 2007 (the year the last integrated assessment was undertaken), using an integrated age-structured model6. The biological stock is therefore not considered to be recruitment overfished.

The fishing mortality (F)–based assessments indicated that the median fishing pressure on Goldband Snapper in this biological stock was below the target level in 2006, and between the target and the threshold in 20086. These assessments use reference levels that are based on ratios of natural mortality (M) for each species, such that Ftarget = 2/3M, Fthreshold = M and Flimit = 3/2M. Goldband Snapper catches from the Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Kimberley biological stock) from 2006 to 2013 have ranged between 331 and 524 t6. Since 2008, catches of Goldband Snapper have been relatively stable, ranging between 457 and 524 t6. This level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

Pilbara biological stock

The stock assessment for Goldband Snapper in the Pilbara biological stock is based on an assessment of fishing mortality derived from catch-curve analysis of representative samples of the age structure in the Pilbara demersal fisheries (Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery, Pilbara Line Fishery, Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery). These fishing mortality–based assessments use reference levels that are based on ratios of natural mortality for each species, such that Ftarget = 2/3M, Fthreshold = M and Flimit = 3/2M. The fishing mortality–based assessments indicated that the estimated fishing level on Goldband Snapper in this biological stock was either below the target level or between the target and threshold levels in 2008, depending on the area of the fisheries6. This indicates that fishing is not having an unacceptable impact on the age structure of the population. The biological stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

Goldband Snapper catches from the Pilbara demersal fisheries (Pilbara biological stock) from 2006 to 2013 have also been stable under current fishing pressure, ranging between 112 and 168 t6. This evidence indicates that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

Gascoyne biological stock

The stock assessment for Goldband Snapper in the Gascoyne biological stock is based on an assessment of fishing mortality derived from catch-curve analysis of representative samples of the age structure in the Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia). These fishing mortality–based assessments use reference levels that are based on ratios of natural mortality for each species, such that Ftarget = 2/3M, Fthreshold = M and Flimit = 3/2M. The fishing mortality–based assessments indicated that the estimated fishing level on Goldband Snapper in this biological stock was below the target level in 2006 and 20085. This indicates that fishing is not having an unacceptable impact on the age structure of the population. The biological stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

Goldband Snapper catches from the Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Gascoyne biological stock) ranged from 240 to 311 t between 2002 and 20045. Catch levels from 2005 to 2009 were lower, ranging between 105 and 144 t5. Catch levels since 2010 have been much reduced, ranging between 53 and 64 t5. Low catches, coupled with low fishing pressure, indicate that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: Goldband Snapper biology1,2,7,8

Longevity and maximum size

30 years; 700 mm FL, 810 mm TL

Maturity (50%)

8 years; 470 mm FL, 550 mm TL

FL = fork length; TL = total length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Goldband Snapper in Australian waters, 2013
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Goldband Snapper in Australian waters, 2013
Note: For Queensland, the reporting period for the Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery and Deep Water Fin Fish Fishery is financial year (2012–13).



Table 3: Main features and statistics for Goldband Snapper fisheries in Australia, 2013

Jurisdiction

Northern Territory

Queenslanda

Western Australia

Fishing methods

Commercial

Hand line

b

Rod and line

Longline

Dropline

Fish trap

Fish trawl

Recreational (including charter)

Hand line

Rod and line

Indigenousc

Hand line

Rod and line

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Spatial zoning

Total allowable catch

Total allowable effort

Size limits

✓(not in GOCDFFTF)

Vessel restrictions

Gear restrictions

Effort limits

Spatial closures

Temporal closures

Recreational

Licensing

Possession limits

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Temporal closures

Charter

Limited entry

Spatial zoning

Passenger restrictions

Size limits

Bag limits

Possession limits

Spatial closures

Temporal closures

Indigenousc,d

Laws of general application

Active vessels

6 in DF

9 in TRF

32 in CRFFF

0 in DWFFF

1 in GOCDFFTF

11 in GDSMF

8 in NDSMF

2 in PFTIMF

6 in PLF

2 in PTMF

Catch

Commercial

332 t in DF

352 t in TRF

38 t in CRFFF

0 t in DWFFF

1 t in GOCDFFTF

53 t in GDSMF

490 t in NDSMF

78 t in PFTIMF

31 t in PLF

61 t in PTMF

Recreational

0.5 t (2010)

Unknown

2457 fish (2011–12); ~11 t9

Charter

1 t (2012)

1 t

2341 fish; ~10 t

Indigenous

Negligible10

Unknown

Unknown

Markets

Domestic

Export


CRFFF = Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); DF = Demersal Fishery (Northern Territory); DWFFF = Deep Water Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); GDMSF = Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); GOCDFFTF = Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery (Queensland); NDSMF = Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PFTIMF = Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PLF = Pilbara Line Fishery (Western Australia); PTMF = Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery (Western Australia); TRF = Timor Reef Fishery (Northern Territory)

a For Queensland, the reporting period for the CRFFF and DWFFF is financial year (2012–13).

b In the Northern Territory, hand lines, droplines, and rod and line together constituted less than 3 per cent of the total commercial catch.

c Subject to the defence that applies under section 211. of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.

d In Queensland, under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers in Queensland are able to use prescribed traditional and noncommercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.


Figure 2: Commercial catch of Goldband Snapper in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013
Figure 2: Commercial catch of Goldband Snapper in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013
Note: For Queensland, the reporting period for the Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery and Deep Water Fin Fish Fishery is financial year. Western Australian data are combined because of confidentiality issues for one or more stocks in one or more years.



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • The maintenance of high levels of adult biomass of Goldband Snapper in Western Australia, above biomass target levels, results in a low risk to the overall ecosystem from these fisheries. Furthermore, there has been no reduction in either mean trophic level or mean maximum length in the finfish catches recorded within the Pilbara or Kimberley, Western Australia (that is, no fishing-down of the food web)11.

  • Direct impacts on the benthic habitat of fishing activity for Goldband Snapper are limited to those of the trawl fisheries, which are restricted to around 7 per cent of the North West Shelf of Western Australia6 and parts of the Northern Territory. Trawl nets in the Northern Territory have been designed to fish off the seabed, reducing interaction with benthic habitats12.

  • There are few bycatch issues associated with trap- and line-based fishing. Bycatch of dolphins and turtles can occur in the fish trawls, but this has decreased significantly since turtle excluder devices were introduced in Western Australia in 2005 and the Northern Territory in 2006. Given the area of distribution and estimated population size of these protected species, the impact of the fish trawl fishery on the stocks of these protected species is likely to be minimal. Gear and fishing modification continue to reduce this level of interaction5,13.

  • The Northern Territory fisheries that target Goldband Snapper have received full Export Exemption accreditation under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The Western Australian and Queensland east coast fisheries that target Crimson Snapper have received Approved Wildlife Trade Operation Exemption accreditation under the Act (except for the Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery [Western Australia], which does not export fish). These assessments, subject to adherence to any accompanying conditions and recommendations, demonstrate that these fisheries are managed in a manner that does not lead to overfishing, and that fishing operations have a minimal impact on the structure, productivity, function and biological diversity of the ecosystem.


Environmental effects on Goldband Snapper
  • Climate change and climate variability have the potential to impact fish stocks in a range of ways, including influencing their geographic distribution (for example, latitudinal shifts in distribution). However, it is unclear how climate change may affect risks to the sustainability of this species. Slow-growing and long-lived species such as Goldband Snapper are less likely to be affected by short-duration environmental changes (of one or a few years), because adult stocks comprise fish that have been recruited over many years.

  • Changes in ocean chemistry such as ocean acidification have the potential to affect the replenishment rates of fish populations by affecting larval survival14, as well as individual growth rates and spawning output15.



a Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Northern Territory
b Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland
c Department of Fisheries, Western Australia