Australian Sardine Sardinops sagax

Tim Warda, Brett Molonyb, John Stewartc, James Andrewsd and Andy Mooree


Sardine

Table 1: Stock status determination for Australian Sardine

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth, New South Wales, Victoria

South Australia, Victoria

Western Australia

Stocks

Eastern Australian
(NSWOHF, OPSP, SPF)

Southern Australian
(PPBF, SASF)

Western Australian west coast (WCPF)

Western Australian south coast (SCPF)

Stock status

       

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Indicators

Spawning biomass, exploitation rate

Exploitation rate, catch data

Biomass, fishing mortality

Catch


NSWOHF = New South Wales Ocean Hauling Fishery; OPSF = Ocean Purse Seine Fishery (Victoria); PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); SASF = South Australian Sardine Fishery; SCPF = South Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia); SPF = Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth); WCPF = West Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia)


Stock Structure

There is a growing consensus that, for the purposes of fisheries management, the Australian Sardine population comprises four separate biological stocks 1,2. Bass Strait effectively separates the biological stocks that occur off eastern and southern Australia3. A single biological stock occurs off South Australia and western Victoria2. A further two separate biological stocks occur off the south and west coasts of Western Australia1,4. As stock delineation is known for this species, reporting of status is undertaken at the level of individual biological stocks.


Stock Status

The maximum sustainable yield for species at a low trophic levels (forage species), such as Australian Sardine, is typically achieved at a depletion level of approximately 60 per cent, equivalent to 40 per cent of unfished biomass5. However, harvest strategies for fisheries for these species also need to consider potential impacts on biodiversity, and ecosystem structure and function6,7. Biomasses above 75 per cent of the unfished level have been identified as a global average for achieving a balance between protecting ecosystem function and biodiversity, and providing for food production and economic development of low–trophic level species5. However, the south-east Australian ecosystem, including the Great Australian Bight, has been shown to be less sensitive to harvesting of low–trophic level species than other systems worldwide5. A recent study using ecosystem models suggests that maintaining biomasses of small pelagic fishes above 50 per cent of the unfished level will maintain the biodiversity and health of Australia’s marine ecosystems8. Management strategy evaluations suggest that exploitation rates of less than about 30 per cent maintain the spawning biomass of Australian Sardine above 50 per cent of the unfished level8.

Low–trophic level species often undergo large fluctuations in abundance over a variety of spatial and temporal scales. For example, two mass mortality events in the 1990s, caused by Herpesvirus, each killed up to 70 per cent of the adult population of Australian Sardine1,9,10. As well, considerable time and resources are required to develop robust estimates of biomass, and undertake the population modelling required to obtain the estimates of current and virgin biomass that are needed to estimate levels of depletion. For these reasons, performance indicators that relate to levels of depletion of unfished biomass have not been established for Commonwealth and state fisheries for Australian Sardine during their developmental phases 11,12. Instead, exploitation rates (that is, catch as a proportion of spawning biomass), based on estimates of spawning biomass obtained using the daily egg production method (DEPM)13–15, have been used as performance indicators for setting total allowable commercial catches. More recently in the South Australian Sardine Fishery, estimates of spawning biomass have also been used as target and limit reference points. However, in the absence of reliable estimates of virgin biomass, it is difficult to relate these indicators to levels of depletion. Ecological performance indicators monitored and modelled in relation to the South Australian Sardine Fishery, combined with recent analyses8, suggest that exploitation rates of up to 30 per cent are likely to maintain spawning biomass at levels that take into account the ecological importance of Australian Sardine 5,6,11,12.

The information available to assess stock status and the frequency of formal assessments vary among jurisdictions, largely in response to recent catch levels. Catch-and-effort data are monitored annually in all jurisdictions; estimates of spawning biomass have been obtained using the DEPM for each of the four biological stocks; and population modelling has been undertaken for the southern Australian biological stock and the two western Australian biological stocks.

Eastern Australian biological stock

Estimates obtained in 1997, 1998 and 2004 using the DEPM suggest that the spawning biomass of Australian Sardine off eastern Australia is at least 25 000–30 000 tonnes (t)16–18. Catches reached almost 5000 t in 2008–09, but declined to 1097 t in 2012–13 as a result of a reduction in fishing effort; this was partly caused by the destruction of a processing plant in Eden, New South Wales16. Catches from a vessel operating out of Lakes Entrance in Victoria have increased in recent years. The highest annual catch (approximately 5 t in 2009) was around 17 per cent of the best estimate of spawning biomass (around 29 000 t, based on samples collected in 2004). Recent catches equate to exploitation rates of less than 10 per cent16. The current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished19.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Southern Australian biological stock

The majority of the catch from the southern Australian stock is taken from South Australia, with much smaller catches from Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Assessment of the South Australian Sardine Fishery has involved annual and, more recently, biennial DEPM surveys, and population modelling based on spawning biomass estimates, catch and catch-at-age data20,21. The most recent estimate of spawning biomass was around 150 000 t20, which is above the limit reference point of 75 000 t identified in the management plan21. The stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished. The current exploitation rate is around 23 per cent (that is, 34 000 t from an estimated spawning biomass of approximately 150 000 t), which is below the upper target reference point of 30 per cent. This exploitation rate is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Western Australia west coast biological stock

Population modelling, based on spawning biomass estimates (estimated using the DEPM), and catch-at-age and catch data22, suggest that exploitation rates since the late 2000s for the Western Australia west coast stock are less than 10 per cent (2328 t from an estimated spawning biomass of approximately 25 000 t)23. The stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished. This level of fishing mortality is below the limit reference point and is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Western Australia south coast biological stock

Population modelling, based on spawning biomass estimates (estimated using the DEPM), and catch-at-age and catch data23, suggest that exploitation rates since the late 2000s for the Western Australia south coast stock are around 3 per cent (less than 3000 t from an estimated spawning biomass of approximately 97 000 t)23. The stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished. This level of fishing mortality is below the limit reference point and is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: Australian Sardine biology2,17

Longevity and maximum size

9 years; 200–250 mm SL

Maturity (50%)

1–2 years; 145 mm SL

SL = standard length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Australian Sardine in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Australian Sardine in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Note: Data for the Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth), West Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia) and South Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia) are for the 2012–13 financial year. The Western Australian purse-seine fisheries operate over two different seasons; the South Coast Purse-seine Fishery (SCPF) season runs from 1 July to 30 June; the West Coast Purse-seine Fishery season runs from 1 April to 31 March.



Table 3: Main features and statistics for Australian Sardine fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

Commonwealtha

New South Wales

Victoria

South Australia

Western Australiaa,b

Fishing methods

Commercial

Purse seine

Trawling

Recreationalc

Rod and line

Indigenousd

Rod and line

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Total allowable catch

Effort limits

Spatial closures

Gear restrictions

Recreationalc

Bag limits

Spatial closures

Indigenousd,e, f

Bag limits

Spatial closures

Section 37(1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority

Active vessels

 

1 in SPF

9 in NSWOHF

1 in OPSF

6 in PPBF

14 in SASF

13 in SCPF

2 in WCPF

Catch

Commercial

Confidential

352 t in NSWOHF

0.2 t in PPBF

31 981 t in SASF

1983 t in SCPF

16 t in WCPF

Recreationalc

No catch

Unknown

No catch

No catch

No catch

Indigenous

No catch

Unknown

No catch

Unknown

Unknown

Markets

Domestic

Export


NSWOHF = New South Wales Ocean Hauling Fishery; OPSF = Ocean Purse Seine Fishery (Victoria); PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); SASF = South Australian Sardine Fishery; SCPF = South Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia); SPF = Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth); WCPF = West Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia)

a Data for the Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth), West Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia) and South Coast Purse-seine Fishery (Western Australia) are for the 2012–13 financial year. 

b The Western Australia purse-seine fisheries operate over two different seasons. The South Coast Purse-seine Fishery season runs from 1 July to 30 June. The West Coast Purse-seine Fishery season runs from 1 April to 31 March.

c The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.

d The Australian Government does not manage noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

e The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to to take catches outside the recreational limits under the New South Wales Fisheries Management Act 1994, section 37(1)(c1) (Aboriginal cultural fishing authority).

f In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Victorian Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010) are exempt (subject to conditions) from the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, and can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 that authorise customary fishing (e.g. different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2012–13, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access Australian Sardine.


Figure 2: Commercial catch of Australian Sardine in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013 (financial years, except for South Australia
Figure 2: Commercial catch of Australian Sardine in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013 (financial years, except for South Australian Sardine Fishery for which data is provided in calendar years)



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • The rapid growth of the South Australian Sardine Fishery led to community concerns that taking large catches could change the balance of the ecosystems in South Australia’s gulfs and the Great Australian Bight, and potentially affect the region’s higher-level marine predators, including Southern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus maccoyii), seabirds and marine mammals. A large study was conducted to investigate the roles of Australian Sardine in the ecosystem and assess the potential ecological impacts of the fishery6. Despite the rapid growth of the fishery, negligible impacts were found on any species groups, even though several seabirds (for example, crested terns—Sterna bergii) were potentially sensitive to changes in Australian Sardine biomass.

  • The South Australian Sardine Fishery was closed for 2 months in 2005 because of high levels of encirclement and mortality of the Short-beaked Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis)24. A Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species Code of Practice was developed during the closure period that outlined procedures for avoiding encirclements and releasing encircled animals25. Interaction rates decreased significantly following the introduction of the code of practice24,26. A working group that includes industry, fisheries managers, scientists and representatives of conservation agencies meets every quarter to review logbook and observer data, and assess the effectiveness of the code of practice in reducing interaction rates. A report on interaction rates and the effectiveness of the code of practice is published annually.

  • A code of conduct was established in 2006 to reduce Fleshy Footed Shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) interactions in the Western Australian South Coast Purse Seine Fishery27.

  • A Purse Seine Code of Practice was established in 2008 by the Commonwealth industry operators that outlined best practice methods for minimising harmful interactions with threatened, endangered and protected species28.


Environmental effects on Australian Sardine
  • In 1995 and 1998–99, two mass mortality events each killed more fish, over a larger area, than any other monospecific fish kill ever recorded 1. These events were caused by a herpes virus to which the population had minimal or no immunity29. Rates of recovery have been different between stocks; spawning biomass has increased quickly in the southern Australian stock and more slowly in the two Western Australian stocks14,23.

  • Fishers in Western Australia have reported reductions in the availability of large fish on historical fishing grounds in recent years. This may reflect changes in distribution and behaviour associated with warmer oceanic conditions, dredge plumes associated with port expansion, and increases in the abundance of Australian Salmon (Arripis trutta) and seabirds30.

  • There is a relationship between fish condition and upwelling strength. Recent industry reports of increases in fat content of South Australian Sardines may reflect the occurrence of several strong upwelling seasons over the past few years31.



a South Australian Research and Development Institute
b Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
c Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales
d Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria
e Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences